Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study
Summary. This longitudinal study of chemical industry firms shows that direct and indirect business relationships both boost innovation output. However, structural holes—disconnections between a firm's partners—reduce innovation in interfirm collaboration networks. The research demonstrates that network structure significantly affects innovation performance, and optimal network design depends on what firms aim to achieve.
Cite this article
Ahuja, G.. (2000). Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105
Ahuja, Gautam. “Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105.
Ahuja, Gautam. 2000. “Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study.” Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105.
@article{ahuja-2000-collaboration-networks-structural-holes-innovation,
title = {Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study},
author = {Gautam Ahuja},
journal = {Administrative Science Quarterly},
year = {2000},
doi = {10.2307/2667105},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105}
}
TY - JOUR TI - Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study AU - Gautam Ahuja JO - Administrative Science Quarterly PY - 2000 DO - 10.2307/2667105 UR - https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105 ER -
Details
- DOI
- 10.2307/2667105
- Countries
- United States
- Regions
- North America
- Categories
- innovation-networks, innovation-theory, general-innovation
- Added
- 2026-04-28