Nonstate Actors and the Diffusion of Innovations: The Case of Suicide Terrorism
Summary. This paper examines how terrorist groups adopt suicide tactics as an innovation, showing that organizational capabilities and external linkages between groups significantly influence adoption patterns. The study finds that occupation, previously considered a key predictor, does not reliably explain which groups adopt suicide terrorism. By treating suicide tactics as a military innovation diffusion problem, the paper connects terrorism studies to broader innovation theory.
Cite this article
Horowitz, M. C.. (2010). Nonstate Actors and the Diffusion of Innovations: The Case of Suicide Terrorism. International Organization. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818309990233
Horowitz, Michael C.. “Nonstate Actors and the Diffusion of Innovations: The Case of Suicide Terrorism.” International Organization, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818309990233.
Horowitz, Michael C.. 2010. “Nonstate Actors and the Diffusion of Innovations: The Case of Suicide Terrorism.” International Organization. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818309990233.
@article{horowitz-2010-nonstate-actors-diffusion-innovations-case,
title = {Nonstate Actors and the Diffusion of Innovations: The Case of Suicide Terrorism},
author = {Michael C. Horowitz},
journal = {International Organization},
year = {2010},
doi = {10.1017/s0020818309990233},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818309990233}
}
TY - JOUR TI - Nonstate Actors and the Diffusion of Innovations: The Case of Suicide Terrorism AU - Michael C. Horowitz JO - International Organization PY - 2010 DO - 10.1017/s0020818309990233 UR - https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818309990233 ER -
Details
- DOI
- 10.1017/s0020818309990233
- Countries
- United States
- Regions
- North America
- Categories
- innovation-theory, innovation-networks, general-innovation
- Added
- 2026-04-28