OPENNESS IN PRODUCT AND PROCESS INNOVATION
Summary. Open innovation benefits both product and process innovation in Australian firms, but external information sources show diminishing returns over time. Internal and external knowledge complement each other primarily for new products and services rather than process innovation. Investment in absorptive capacity yields declining marginal returns for process innovation but not for product innovation.
Cite this article
Huang, F., & Rice, J.. (2012). OPENNESS IN PRODUCT AND PROCESS INNOVATION. International Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919612003812
Huang, Fang, and John Rice. “OPENNESS IN PRODUCT AND PROCESS INNOVATION.” International Journal of Innovation Management, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919612003812.
Huang, Fang, and John Rice. 2012. “OPENNESS IN PRODUCT AND PROCESS INNOVATION.” International Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919612003812.
@article{huang-2012-openness-product-process-innovation,
title = {OPENNESS IN PRODUCT AND PROCESS INNOVATION},
author = {Fang Huang and John Rice},
journal = {International Journal of Innovation Management},
year = {2012},
doi = {10.1142/s1363919612003812},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919612003812}
}
TY - JOUR TI - OPENNESS IN PRODUCT AND PROCESS INNOVATION AU - Fang Huang AU - John Rice JO - International Journal of Innovation Management PY - 2012 DO - 10.1142/s1363919612003812 UR - https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919612003812 ER -
Details
- DOI
- 10.1142/s1363919612003812
- Countries
- Australia
- Regions
- Oceania
- Categories
- innovation-theory, innovation-networks, general-innovation
- Added
- 2026-04-28