Policy Diffusion and the Pro-innovation Bias
Summary. This paper examines policy diffusion across U.S. states using interstate compacts as a case study. The authors find that existing diffusion research focuses only on widely adopted policies, creating a bias that distorts findings. By analyzing all interstate compacts with variable adoption rates, they show this bias leads researchers to overestimate geographic and policy factors while underestimating professional networks and learning from prior adoptions.
Cite this article
Karch, A., Nicholson‐Crotty, S., Woods, N. D., & Bowman, A. O.. (2016). Policy Diffusion and the Pro-innovation Bias. Political Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915622289
Karch, Andrew, et al. “Policy Diffusion and the Pro-innovation Bias.” Political Research Quarterly, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915622289.
Karch, Andrew, Sean Nicholson‐Crotty, Neal D. Woods, and Ann O’M. Bowman. 2016. “Policy Diffusion and the Pro-innovation Bias.” Political Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915622289.
@article{karch-2016-policy-diffusion-pro-innovation-bias,
title = {Policy Diffusion and the Pro-innovation Bias},
author = {Andrew Karch and Sean Nicholson‐Crotty and Neal D. Woods and Ann O’M. Bowman},
journal = {Political Research Quarterly},
year = {2016},
doi = {10.1177/1065912915622289},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915622289}
}
TY - JOUR TI - Policy Diffusion and the Pro-innovation Bias AU - Andrew Karch AU - Sean Nicholson‐Crotty AU - Neal D. Woods AU - Ann O’M. Bowman JO - Political Research Quarterly PY - 2016 DO - 10.1177/1065912915622289 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915622289 ER -
Details
- DOI
- 10.1177/1065912915622289
- Countries
- United States
- Regions
- North America
- Categories
- policy, innovation-theory, general-innovation
- Added
- 2026-04-28