The double disadvantage of rural place-based policies
Summary. Rural regions face a double disadvantage under current place-based policies: they lack the agglomeration economies and institutional capabilities that urban areas possess. This scoping review of 2008–2022 literature shows that place-based policies, particularly the urban-centric smart specialisation model, fail to address rural needs. The authors argue that effective rural policy must move beyond urban templates, strengthen rural institutions, accept that growth isn't essential, and develop genuinely tailored strategies recognizing peripheral regions as valuable assets.
Cite this article
Lien, S., & Higdem, U.. (2025). The double disadvantage of rural place-based policies. Fennia. https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.147442
Lien, Stine, and Ulla Higdem. “The double disadvantage of rural place-based policies.” Fennia, 2025. https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.147442.
Lien, Stine, and Ulla Higdem. 2025. “The double disadvantage of rural place-based policies.” Fennia. https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.147442.
@article{lien-2025-double-disadvantage-rural-place-based,
title = {The double disadvantage of rural place-based policies},
author = {Stine Lien and Ulla Higdem},
journal = {Fennia},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.11143/fennia.147442},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.147442}
}
TY - JOUR TI - The double disadvantage of rural place-based policies AU - Stine Lien AU - Ulla Higdem JO - Fennia PY - 2025 DO - 10.11143/fennia.147442 UR - https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.147442 ER -
Details
- DOI
- 10.11143/fennia.147442
- Countries
- United States
- Regions
- North America
- Categories
- policy, regional-innovation-systems
- Added
- 2026-04-28