Business models for maximising the diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture
Summary. Current business models for delivering climate-smart agricultural technologies fail to optimize diffusion because they misalign with farmer needs. The study identifies critical gaps in value propositions, distribution channels, customer relationships, resources, partnerships, and cost structures. Innovation providers and potential users hold conflicting views about what works. The authors recommend redesigning business models to better match farmer adoption requirements and accelerate climate-smart agriculture uptake.
Cite this article
Long, T. B., Blok, V., & Poldner, K.. (2016). Business models for maximising the diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr2016.0081
Long, Thomas B., et al. “Business models for maximising the diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture.” The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2016. https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr2016.0081.
Long, Thomas B., Vincent Blok, and Kim Poldner. 2016. “Business models for maximising the diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture.” The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr2016.0081.
@article{long-2016-business-models-maximising-diffusion-technological,
title = {Business models for maximising the diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture},
author = {Thomas B. Long and Vincent Blok and Kim Poldner},
journal = {The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review},
year = {2016},
doi = {10.22434/ifamr2016.0081},
url = {https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr2016.0081}
}
TY - JOUR TI - Business models for maximising the diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture AU - Thomas B. Long AU - Vincent Blok AU - Kim Poldner JO - The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review PY - 2016 DO - 10.22434/ifamr2016.0081 UR - https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr2016.0081 ER -
Details
- DOI
- 10.22434/ifamr2016.0081
- Countries
- Netherlands
- Regions
- Europe
- Categories
- agtech, climate-and-environment, innovation-theory
- Added
- 2026-04-28