Planning, Land and Housing in the Digital Data Revolution/The Politics of Digital Transformations of Housing/Digital Innovations, PropTech and Housing – the View from Melbourne/Digital Housing and Renters: Disrupting the Australian Rental Bond System and Tenant Advocacy/Prospects for an Intelligent Planning System/What are the Prospects for a Politically Intelligent Planning System?

Libby Porter, Desiree Fields, Ani Landau-Ward, Dallas Rogers, Jathan Sadowski, Sophia Maalsen, Rob Kitchin, Oliver Dawkins, Gareth W. Young, Lisa K. Bates · 2019 · Planning Theory & Practice

Summary. Digital planning systems promise to predict urban development outcomes, but housing data gaps systematically undercount vulnerable populations. The author's research in Portland, Oregon reveals that despite regional modeling capacity, comprehensive rental housing data remains unavailable due to political and market barriers, not technical limitations. This prevents planners from accurately forecasting displacement risks when transit investments reshape neighborhoods.

Read the original

Cite this article

Porter, L., Fields, D., Landau-Ward, A., Rogers, D., Sadowski, J., Maalsen, S., Kitchin, R., Dawkins, O., Young, G. W., & Bates, L. K.. (2019). Planning, Land and Housing in the Digital Data Revolution/The Politics of Digital Transformations of Housing/Digital Innovations, PropTech and Housing – the View from Melbourne/Digital Housing and Renters: Disrupting the Australian Rental Bond System and Tenant Advocacy/Prospects for an Intelligent Planning System/What are the Prospects for a Politically Intelligent Planning System?. Planning Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1651997

@article{porter-2019-planning-land-housing-digital-data,
  title   = {Planning, Land and Housing in the Digital Data Revolution/The Politics of Digital Transformations of Housing/Digital Innovations, PropTech and Housing – the View from Melbourne/Digital Housing and Renters: Disrupting the Australian Rental Bond System and Tenant Advocacy/Prospects for an Intelligent Planning System/What are the Prospects for a Politically Intelligent Planning System?},
  author  = {Libby Porter and Desiree Fields and Ani Landau-Ward and Dallas Rogers and Jathan Sadowski and Sophia Maalsen and Rob Kitchin and Oliver Dawkins and Gareth W. Young and Lisa K. Bates},
  journal = {Planning Theory & Practice},
  year    = {2019},
  doi     = {10.1080/14649357.2019.1651997},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1651997}
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Planning, Land and Housing in the Digital Data Revolution/The Politics of Digital Transformations of Housing/Digital Innovations, PropTech and Housing – the View from Melbourne/Digital Housing and Renters: Disrupting the Australian Rental Bond System and Tenant Advocacy/Prospects for an Intelligent Planning System/What are the Prospects for a Politically Intelligent Planning System?
AU  - Libby Porter
AU  - Desiree Fields
AU  - Ani Landau-Ward
AU  - Dallas Rogers
AU  - Jathan Sadowski
AU  - Sophia Maalsen
AU  - Rob Kitchin
AU  - Oliver Dawkins
AU  - Gareth W. Young
AU  - Lisa K. Bates
JO  - Planning Theory & Practice
PY  - 2019
DO  - 10.1080/14649357.2019.1651997
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1651997
ER  -

Details

DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2019.1651997
Countries: United States
Regions: North America
Categories: broadband-and-digital, policy, rural-data-and-definitions, general-innovation
Added: 2026-04-28